Skip to main content
DA / EN

Evaluation strategy

BA in Design Culture and BA in Design and Cultural Economics: Freedom of method. If lecturers wish to use EVAL, please contact SDU Student Services. All offered subjects are evaluated mid-term. Subjects that are co-taught with BSc/Economics and are compulsory for BSc students are evaluated by SAMF.

MA in Design Studies and MA in Design Management: Freedom of method. If lecturers wish to use EVAL, please contact SDU Student Services. All offered subjects are evaluated mid-term.

Business, Language and Culture (tourism): Freedom of method. All offered subjects are evaluated mid-term.

BSc in International Business Economics with Foreign Languages and MSc in Business, Language and Culture: Meetings are held with spokespersons from all semesters once per semester. The Head of Studies convenes the meetings. Minutes are taken of the meetings. The minutes are submitted to the Study Board for information. Subjects are evaluated depending on which topics the students bring up.

BSc in International Business Economics with Foreign Languages and MSc in Business, Language and Culture: Written via EVAL. All offered subjects are evaluated at the end of the course.

BA in Design Culture and BA in Design and Cultural Economics: Written evaluation via EVAL. All offered subjects are evaluated at the end of the course. Subjects that are co-taught with BSc/Economics and are compulsory for BSc students are evaluated by SAMF.

MA in Design Studies and MA in Design Management: Written evaluation via EVAL. All offered subjects are evaluated at the end of the course.

Business, Language and Culture (tourism) and EMTM: Written via EVAL. Overall evaluation for both study programmes as well as a separate one for EMTM. All offered subjects are evaluated at the end of the course.

No.
Statement
1
Purpose: The purpose of the subject and what I am expected to learn were made clear to me at an early stage of the teaching. [Please elaborate/give examples]
2
Link: There is a clear connection between the purpose of the subject, the content of the teaching and the exam. [Please elaborate/give examples]
3
Understanding: I have gained a greater understanding of the subject’s themes and topics through the teaching (incl. independent preparation, work in study groups, etc.) [Please elaborate/give examples]
4 Cooperation and dialogue: There has been good cooperation and dialogue between students and lecturers. [Please elaborate/give examples]
5  Activity: The organisation and execution of the teaching has supported me in actively learning (e.g. through discussions, exercises, group work and independent preparation). [Please elaborate/give examples]
Relection on own efforts: I have contributed to the teaching, including discussions, exercises, group work and independent preparation. [Please elaborate/give examples]
 7 Reflection on the team's contribution: The team has contributed to the teaching, including discussions, exercises, group work and independent preparation. [Please elaborate/give examples]
Scoring scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree, 6 = undecided/irrelevant

The Study Board processes the results of the evaluations twice a year, cf. the annual cycle, and in connection with the status meetings for the Educational Report.

The results of the evaluations are published via the reporting form for the evaluation of education programmes.

The Study Board’s evaluation strategy is discussed at least once a year, cf. the annual cycle.

All education programmes: The lecturers are encouraged to allocate time in their teaching for both the evaluation and a subsequent discussion of the evaluation results well before the start of the semester. The lecturers must draw attention to the importance. The members of the Study Board must make the students aware of the importance.
Feedback takes place directly in class.

Last Updated 12.04.2021