Oral mid-term evaluation is optional and not a requirement. The lecturer is responsible. All subjects can be evaluated
A final written evaluation is conducted for all subjects. The following five questions are used.
The Study Board and lecturers are responsible.
| No. | Statement |
| 1 |
Purpose: The purpose of the subject and what I am expected to learn were made clear to me at an early stage of the teaching (here, ‘purpose’ relates to the subject, but may also include a career dimension). [free text field to be inserted] |
| 2 |
Link: There is a clear connection between the purpose of the subject, the content of the course and the method of assessment, as well as between the subject and the other subject elements of the education programme. [free text field to be inserted] |
| 3 |
Understanding: I have gained a greater understanding of the subject’s themes and topics during the course (incl. independent preparation, working in study groups etc.) [free text field to be inserted] |
| 4 |
Activity: The course has supported me in actively learning (e.g. through discussions, exercises, group work and independent preparation). [free text field to be inserted] |
| 5 |
Cooperation and dialogue: There has been a good cooperation and dialogue between students and lecturers. [free text field to be inserted] |
| No. |
Questions |
| 1 |
How was the introduction at the internship site? |
| 2 |
To what extent did you know what the objectives were for your internship? |
| 3 |
To what extent did you find that your supervisors knew what the objectives were for your internship? |
| 4 |
To what extent was your stay well-planned (work tasks during the day, times, overall plan etc.)? |
| 5 |
Did your supervisors show interest in you by evaluating your knowledge, skills and competencies? |
| 6 |
Did your stay stimulate you to undertake further studies? |
| 7 |
To what extent were you allowed to do practical work yourself? |
| 8 |
To what extent were you taught practical skills? |
| 9 |
To what extent did you receive feedback on your activities, skills and competencies? |
| 10 |
Did the internship’s various staff groups show commitment to and interest in you and your education programme? |
The Study Board processes the results of the evaluations twice a year, cf. the annual cycle, and in connection with the status meetings for the Educational Report.
The results of the evaluations are published via the reporting form for the evaluation of education programmes.
The Study Board’s evaluation strategy is discussed at least once a year, cf. the annual cycle.
Time is allocated during the course for filling in and answering.
Students receive a response to their evaluation either in the last lesson or in writing via SDU’s digital platform.