Evaluation strategy

No.	Statement
1	Purpose: The purpose, content and learning objectives of the course have been clear to me.
2	Link: The individual learning activities have made sense in relation to the purpose, learning objectives and method of assessment of the course.
3	Understanding: I have gained a greater understanding of the subject’s themes and topics through the teaching, my preparation, the work in my study group etc.
4	Activity: The various learning activities in and outside class have promoted my active participation and learning.
5	Cooperation and dialogue: There has been a good collaboration and a good dialogue between students and lecturers.

Scoring scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree, 6 = undecided/irrelevant

The Study Board processes the results of the evaluations twice a year, cf. the annual cycle, and in connection with the status meetings for the Educational Report.

The results of the evaluations are published via the reporting form for the evaluation of education programmes.

The Study Board’s evaluation strategy is discussed at least once a year, cf. the annual cycle.

The Study Board and lecturers must continue to emphasise to the students that their input is essential and taken seriously. In addition, time must be allocated during class for the students to fill in evaluation forms and for the evaluation to be discussed afterwards.

The evaluation is discussed during the last teaching session of the courses. The possibility of holding a ‘German day’ per semester and across year groups is also examined, where students are involved in quality assurance and development of teaching – among other things on the basis of the existing evaluations.

At the same time, please keep SN informed about other education programmes’ initiatives in relation to feedback to the students, as these initiatives may be able to serve as inspiration for the study of German.