Towards the end of each semester, evaluation forms are sent out to all students in all subjects. A final evaluation in writing is conducted for all courses and based on five established categories (purpose, context, understanding, activity, collaboration and dialogue) as well as five fixed questions. The Study Board is responsible for the implementation of the evaluation.
All offered subjects are evaluated at the end of the course. See the next item for an overview of the questions.
No. |
Statement |
1 |
Purpose: The purpose of the subject and what I am expected to learn were made clear to me at an early stage of the teaching. |
2 |
Link: There is a clear connection between the purpose of the subject, the content of the teaching and the exam. |
3 |
Understanding: I have gained a greater understanding of the subject’s themes and topics through the teaching (incl. independent preparation, work in study groups etc.). |
4 |
Activity: The teaching has supported me in actively learning (e.g. through discussions, exercises, group work and independent preparation). |
5 |
Cooperation and dialogue: The cooperation and dialogue between students and lecturers was good. |
At the end of each semester, evaluation forms are sent out to all students in all subjects. All courses are final evaluated in writing based on 5 established categories (purpose, context, understanding, activity, collaboration and dialogue) as well as 5 five fixed questions. In addition, free text fields are supplemented for all 5 questions. For the master's program, 2 questions are added about the balance between physical and online teaching, as well as the connection between theory and practice in education and in business. The study board is responsible for the implementation of the evaluation.
The Study Board processes the results of the evaluations twice a year, cf. the annual cycle, and in connection with the status meetings for the Educational Report.
The results of the evaluations are published via the reporting form for the evaluation of education programmes.
The Study Board’s evaluation strategy is discussed at least once a year, cf. the annual cycle.